The-Third-World-War-3-start-in-SriLanka-2019

The Third World War (3) - start in Sri Lanka ?

The-Third-World-War-3-Definitely-start-in-Sri-Lanka-Ahfesl-06-December-2019

 
The Third World War (3) - start in Sri Lanka ?
 
 

Le Troisième (3) Guerre Mondiale va-t-il commencer par le Sri Lanka?

The Third-(3)-World War Will start From Sri Lanka?

!! Sri Lanka is a very important global war point strategy for All Rich Countries in the world !!

!! Sri Lanka, c'est une très grand important point de guerre stratégie mondiale pour tous les pays de riche au monde !!

!! ලෝකයේ ධනවත් රටවල් සඳහා ශ්‍රී-ලංකාව ඉතා වැදගත් ගෝලීය යුද උපා මාර්ගකික රටක් වේ!!

 

Pray-for-SriLanka-L.Salgado-FB

 

 

Read this Pages :: Lire ces Pages

!! Sri Lanka is a very important global war point strategy for All Rich Countries in the world !!

!! Sri Lanka, c'est une très grand important point de guerre stratégie mondiale pour tous les pays de riche au monde !!

!! ලෝකයේ ධනවත් රටවල් සඳහා ශ්‍රී-ලංකාව ඉතා වැදගත් ගෝලීය යුද උපා මාර්ගකික රටක් වේ!!

Aujourd'hui Sri Lanka politics sont très dangereux pour le monde entier. Le Troisième (3) Guerre Mondiale va-t-il commencer par le Sri Lanka?

Today Sri Lanka politics are very dangerous for the whole world. Will the Third (3) World War start with Sri Lanka?

!! අද ශ්රී ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනය මුළු ලෝකයටම භයානකයි. තුන්වන (3) ලෝක සංග්රාමය ශ්රී ලංකාව සමග ආරම්භ වේද? !!

 
 
 

Ahfesl-France want Protect Srilanka without 3rd World War of Chinese
Ahfesl-France veut prot'ger le Sri Lanka sans la 3e gurre mondiale des Chinois.

!! ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී ලෝක සාමය විනාශ කර දැමීම සඳහා ශ්‍රී ලංකාව හරහා 3 වැනි ලෝක යුද්ධය ඇති කිරීමට උත්සාහ කරන ඒ සියලුම දුෂ්ට ලෝක අපරාධකරුවන්ගෙන් "ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ලෝක සාම භූමිය" කෙසේ හෝ ආරක්‍ෂා කර ගනිමු. !!

CLICK HERE :: CLIQUEZ ICI

CLICK HERE :: CLIQUEZ ICI

 
 

The Message of President Ahfesl.org Against World War III :: Le message du Président "Ahfesl.org contre la Troisième guerre mondiale

Pour Lire ce Message :: CLICK Here (ICI)

 
 

 

Todays, In the World, All Medias International Against to Sri-Lankan Cruel Politics !! (Aujourd'hui, dans le Monde, Tous les médias d'Internationaux Contre les mauvaise Politique du Sri-Lanka) !!

Medias - FRENCH & English

CLICK HERE :: CLIQUEZ ICI

Medias - SINHAL - සිංහල

CLICK HERE :: CLIQUEZ ICI

 

Today in the world, all Medias of International against for Dangerous politics of Sri Lanka. Especially Politics of RAJAPAKSA-MAITHREE Junta.

( Aujourd'hui dans le monde, tous les médias de l'international contre pour la politique dangerouse du Sri Lanka. Notamment la politique de la Junte de Rajapaksa-Maithree).

අද විශේෂයෙන්ම, ශ්‍රී-ලංකාව තුළ රාජපක්'ෂ-මෛත්‍රී ජුන්ටාව පවත්වා යන භයානක දේශපාලනයට එරෙහිව ලෝකය තුළ පවත්වා යන සියලු All International Medias ජනමාධ්‍යයන් මෙසේ ක්‍රියා කරනු ලබයි !!

!!ශ්‍රී-ලංකාවට අවාසිදායක ජාත්‍යන්තර උණුසුම් පුවත් බලන්න මෙයින් ඇතුල් වන්න
(මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ-මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන විසින් කරනු ලබන මේ ජාතික අපරාධයන්ට සහ ජාත්‍යන්තර අපහාසයන්ට මුළුමනින්ම ඔවුන් වගකිවයුතු වේ. මෙය 1983 කළු-ජූලිය මෙන් මුළු මහත් සිංහල ජනතාවටම 2018 දී ජාත්‍යන්තරව කරන ලද ලොකුම ලොකු අපහාසයයි.

1983 කළු-ජූලිය සහ 1988-89 වර්‍ෂවල සියලු මිලේච්ඡ මිනිස් ඝාතනයන් මෙහෙයවා ලොවටම ප්‍රදර්ශනයකර සිංහලයා මිලේච්ඡ ගොත්‍රික ජාතියක් බවට මනා ලෙස ඔප්පුකර මුළු මහත් සිංහල ජනතාවටම ජාත්‍යයන්තරව ඉමහත් අප කීර්තියක් උදාකරනු ලැබුවේ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්‍ෂයේ මිනීමරු ඒකාධිපති ජේ.ආර්. ජයවර්ධන සහ ආර්. ප්‍රේමදාස ලා බව අපගේ නවක තරුණ-තරුණියන් කිසිසේත්ම අමතක නොකළ යුතුව ඇත.)!!


2-SRILANKA PARLIAMENT JOKES FROM MEDIAS INTERNATIONAL 2018-2

 

 
 

One Day INDIA + USA + EU + UNO Against China & Sri-Lanka ?

අසත්පුරුෂ ඒකාධිපති රාජපක්‍ෂ පවුලේ සහ එම රෙජිමයේ අරුම පුදුම කාලකණ්නී බල තණ්හාව නිසා (3) තුන්වන ලෝක මහා සංග්‍රාමය ලංකාවෙන් අරඹයි

(මෙම සියලු තොරතුරු දැක බලා ගැනීමට sandaru-n සිංහල අකුරු Download කර ගන්න අමතක නොකරන්න)

 

CLICK ICI
 
 
!! Today Sri Lanka politics are very dangerous for the whole world. Will the Third (3) World War start with Sri Lanka? !!

Befor All, Today start Thinking, Individually and Collectively how to Protect your People and your Country, and The World.

So today, the great responsibility of every honest citizen in the world is to start thinking how to protect your people and your country. And at the same time also thinking how to protect the World. Today the whole world is in very great danger. Not only in France and Sri Lanka.

To avoid this war, first of all do not let to install, for any politicians Dictator in any country of the world.

And at the same time also thinking about protecting the environment, Against Unemployment, Against Inequality and Precariousness, Against political dictatorship, Racisme religions actions and Communalism, etc...

 
!! Aujourd'hui Sri Lanka politics sont très dangereux pour le monde entier. Le Troisième (3) Guerre Mondiale va-t-il commencer par le Sri Lanka? !!

Alors Aujourd'hui avant toutes, Individuellement et Collectivement Penser comment protéger votre Peuple, et votre Pays, et le Monde.

Aujourd'hui le Monde entier est en très très grand danger. N'est pas seulement en France et en Sri Lanka. Alors, aujourd'hui, Le grande responsabilité de chaques honnête citoyen au monde entier est commencer penser comment protéger Votre peuple et votre Pays. Et à la même-temps penser aussi comment protéger le Monde.

Premièrement, prends toutes actions nécessaire pour éviter le Troisième (3) guerre de mondiale. Pour éviter cette guerre, toute d'abord ne laissez pas pour installer, pour aucun Dictator de politicians dans aucune pays du monde.

Et la même-temps penser aussi protéger les environnement, Contre Chômages, Contre Inégalité et Précarité, Contre dictateur politiques, racisme réligeons et le communalisme, etc...)

 
!! අද ශ්රී ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනය මුළු ලෝකයටම භයානකයි. තුන්වන (3) ලෝක සංග්රාමය ශ්රී ලංකාව සමග ආරම්භ වේද?

!! අන් සියල්ලටම පෙර, අද සිට ඔබේ ජනතාව ගැන, ඔබේ රට ගැන සහ මේ මුළු ලෝකයම ආරක්ෂා කරගන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න ගැන සිතන්න පටන් ගන්න.

එබැවින් අද සෑම අවංක පුරවැසියෙකුගේම වගකීම වන්නේ ඔබේ ජනතාව සහ ඔබේ රට ආරක්ෂා කර ගත යුතු ආකාරය ගැන සිතීමයි. ඒ වගේම ලෝකය ආරක්ෂා කරන ආකාරය ගැනත් කල්පනා කරන්න. අද මුළු ලෝකයම ඉතාම අන්තරායක ය. ප්රංශය සහ ශ්රී ලංකාව තුළ පමණක් නොවේ.

මෙම යුද්ධයෙන් වැළකී සිටීමට නම්, ප්රථමයෙන් කළ යුත්තේ ලෝකයේ කිසිම රටකට ඒකාධිපති දේශපාලනඥයෙකු බිහි වීමට ඉඩ නොදීමයි.

ඒ අතරම, පරිසරය ආරක්‍ෂා කරලීම, විරැකියාව සහ අසමානතාව හා සමාජ පිළි නොගැනීම් වලට එරෙහිව ක්‍රියාකරලීම, දේශපාලන ආඥාදායකත්වයට මෙන්ම ජාති වාදයන් සහ සියලු වර්ගවාදයන්ට එරෙහිව ක්‍රියාකරලීම අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය වේ.

 

 

China's growing influence swallows global criticism on human rights - Read more at:
https://www.axios.com/chinas-influence-global-criticism-human-rights-9bea0780-90a6-4f65-8899-4aa5ebf714d0.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Chinese media speaks in different voices about India's milit ..
Read more at:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/chinese-media-speaks-in-different-voices-about-indias-military-strength/articleshow/59533522.cms

For the Chainise Informations via Google

 
World War 3 WARNING: Trump to RETREAT? China to CRUSH US in South China Sea

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1065859/world-war-3-donald-trump-usa-china-news-south-china-sea-latest-xi-jinping
CHINA will crush Donald Trump’s military if they dare to flex their military muscles in the South China Sea, an expert has warned in a menacing World War 3 warning.

By Thomas Mackie
PUBLISHED: 03:03, Wed, Jan 2, 2019 | UPDATED: 07:19, Wed, Jan 2, 2019
Video Player is loading.


USA-Against-China-Express.co-UK-02.01.2019-1

China has the ability to control the South China Sea and the US could be forced to retreat as Beijing prepares for war. China, along with several of its neighbours including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan have been involved in a decades-long dispute over who controls the South China Sea. Xi Jinping's superstate claims most of the sea as its territory but China’s neighbours argue parts of the area belong to them. Tensions have skyrocketed in recent years and resulted in the involvement of the US.

Bryan Clark of the Centre for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments said: “China has the ability to control the South China Sea because it has established escalation dominance in that area.”

Beijing’s main priorities for 2019 include strengthening its military training and preparation for war.

An editorial published on New Year’s Day in the state-run military newspaper the PLA Daily said: “We should be well prepared for all directions of military struggle and comprehensively improve troops’ combat response in emergencies to ensure we can meet the challenge and win when there is a situation.”

Mr Clark went on to add: “China now has the world’s largest navy, which has more than 300 ships.

“If you want to be able to conduct sea control in a region, having a big navy is a valuable part of that.

“China is able to focus the attention of that navy on near seas to an extent that its competitors like the US cannot.

 
World War 3 alert: China plans to take Taiwan by FORCE - 'A war of LIBERATION'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1057135/World-War-3-China-Taiwan-South-China-Sea-US-xi-jinping-news

A SENIOR CHINESE General has advocated for military action to retake control of the self-governing island of Taiwan, claiming when the “strategic opportunity emerges”, Beijing should not fear starting a “war of liberation”.

By Martina Bet
PUBLISHED: 03:25, Tue, Dec 11, 2018 | UPDATED: 12:28, Tue, Dec 11, 2018


VIDEO :

Speaking at a conference organised by the ruling Communist Party's official newspaper The Global Times, Senior Colonel Dai Xu discussed the forceful reunification of China and Taiwan in light of the heightened tensions in the South China Sea. Mr Dai, who serves as the president of the country's Marine Institute for Security and Cooperation, urged the military to ramp up its aggression towards the US in the dispute waters, and suggested some provocation might push China towards military action targeting Taiwan. The Chinese General said: "Why do we put the battlefield in the South China Sea and Taiwan?

“If cross-Straits tensions rise, there is no need to think too much.

“Though the economy is the most important aspect of overall development and we should definitely focus on saving it, once the opportunity for reunification comes, why not take it?

“Tensions will accelerate reunification and will only be the beginning of Taiwan's war of liberation.”


World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-01

A Chinese General has advocated for military action to retake control of Taiwan (Image: GETTY)


World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-02

A Chinese aircraft carrier in the South China Sea (Image: GETTY)

Taiwan considers itself an independent nation, but Beijing claims it as its sacred territory, or a wayward province.

China's hostility towards Taiwan has grown since Tsai Ing-wen, from the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party, won a presidential election on the island in 2016.

Beijing fears she wants to push for the island's formal independence and has ramped up military exercises around Taiwan in the past year, including flying bombers around the self-governing land.

Some analysts claim Chinese President Xi Jinping, one of the most powerful Chinese leaders in decades, seems intent on bringing the self-ruled province under Beijing’s control during his time in office, which would place him in the history books alongside Mao Zedong.


World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-03

However, last month, Taiwan's President vowed Teipei will never surrender to Chinese suppression and also emphasised the contrasting behaviour between her administration and Beijing’s, while reinforcing Taiwan's self-rule.

Ms Ing-wen said: “We will not escalate conflicts impulsively and we will not cave in and submit to pressure from China.

“Taiwan’s democratic transition provides a ray of light in the dark for all those seeking democracy.

"Protecting the free, democratic lifestyle of the 23million people, safeguarding the sustainable development of Republic of China, or Taiwan and maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait and regional stability is the common denominator shared by all Taiwanese people.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1057135/World-War-3-China-Taiwan-South-China-Sea-US-xi-jinping-news

 
World War 3: Has China just triggered a new conflict after threatening Taiwan with FORCE

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1065929/World-War-3-China-Taiwan-relations-xi-jinping-China-conflict-Taiwan-independence

CHINA’S President Xi Jinping just announced China will reserve the right to use force to bring Taiwan under its control, sparking fear of a new conflict breaking out.
By Amalie Henden

PUBLISHED: 09:08, Wed, Jan 2, 2019 | UPDATED: 09:16, Wed, Jan 2, 2019

On Wednesday president Xi Jinping said China reserves the right to use force regarding keeping Taiwan under its control. The Chinese president added Taiwan has a “bright future under Chinese rule”. Taiwan is known as one of the superpower’s most sensitive issues.

However, Mr Xi added China will “strive to achieve peaceful reunification with the island.

In a speech marking 40 years since the start of improving relations, Mr Xi reiterated Beijing's call for peaceful unification on a one-country-two-systems basis.

The island state of Taiwan is currently self-governed but has never formally declared independence from the Chinese mainland.

Mr Xi said both sides were part of the same Chinese family and that Taiwanese independence was "an adverse current from history and a dead end".


World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-04

World War 3: China and Taiwan's relationship is at risk after shock statement made by Xi Jinping (Image: GETTY)
He said: “China won’t attack Chinese people.

“We are willing to use the greatest sincerity and expend the greatest hard work to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification.”

But the Chinese president added China "do not promise to renounce the use of force and reserve the option to use all necessary measures” to achieve this goal and prevent Taiwan independence.

It is thought the speech was aimed at foreign forces, including the United States, who seek to interfere and the tiny minority of Taiwan independence forces and their activities.


World War 3: China said they will reserve the right to use force to keep Taiwan under its control (Image: GETTY)

World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-04


He said: “China won’t attack Chinese people.

“We are willing to use the greatest sincerity and expend the greatest hard work to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification.”

But the Chinese president added China "do not promise to renounce the use of force and reserve the option to use all necessary measures” to achieve this goal and prevent Taiwan independence.

It is thought the speech was aimed at foreign forces, including the United States, who seek to interfere and the tiny minority of Taiwan independence forces and their activities.


World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-05

The president also sought to reassure people in Taiwan there was nothing to fear from Chinese rule.

Mr Xi said: “After peaceful reunification, Taiwan will have lasting peace and the people will enjoy good and prosperous lives.

“With the great motherland’s support, Taiwan compatriots’ welfare will be even better, their development space will be even greater."

But most Taiwanese people have shown no interest in being run by autocratic Beijing.


World-war-3-china-news-china-taiwan-Expresse.Co-UK-02.01.2019-06

And as the de-facto independent state prepares for their presidential elections in 2019, current president Tsai Ing-wen said she wants to maintain the status quo with China.

However, she added China must use peaceful means to resolve its differences with Taiwan and respect its democratic values.

In her New Year’s Eve speech, Tsai said: “The election results absolutely don’t mean Taiwan’s basic public opinion wants us to give up our self-rule.

“And they absolutely don’t mean that the Taiwanese people want us to give ground on our autonomy.”

China and Taiwan have been governed separately since the Chinese civil war of the 1940s.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1065929/World-War-3-China-Taiwan-relations-xi-jinping-China-conflict-Taiwan-independence

 
Chinese admiral warns Beijing could SINK two US aircraft carriers in CHILLING WW3 threat

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1065833/world-war-3-china-usa-lou-yuan-donald-trump-usa-aircraft-carrier-trade-war

A CHINESE admiral has issued a chilling threat to the US by suggesting that Beijing could settle its disputes with Washington by sinking two American aircraft carriers.
By Harvey Gavin
PUBLISHED: 00:31, Wed, Jan 2, 2019 | UPDATED: 08:01, Wed, Jan 2, 2019

VIDEO ::

Rear Admiral Lou Yuan told an audience in Shenzhen that “what the United States fears the most is taking casualties” before declaring that destroying one of its supercarriers would kill 5,000 navy personnel. Bragging about China’s anti-shop missile capabilities, Lou added that sinking two carriers would double that figure, the New York-based Epoch Times reports. He told a top military summit: “We’ll see how frightened America is.”

In the wide-ranging speech on December 20, Lou discussed China-US relations and the escalating trade war between Washington and Bejing.

The military academic went on to insist that the trade spat was “definitely not simply friction over economics and trade”, warning that the conflict was instead a “prime strategic issue”.

China is continuing to flex its muscles in East Asia, expanding its influence in the East China Sea and strengthening its claims over the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.

US warships are deployed in the region with the aim of monitoring Chinese expansion and vessels from the rival nations have come close to colliding with each other in recent months.


world-war-3-China-USA-Expresse.Co-UK-01

World War 3: A Chinese admiral suggested sinking a US carrier would force Mr Trump to back down (Image: GETTY IMAGES)


world-war-3-China-USA-Expresse.Co-UK-02


Rear Admiral Lou Yuan said sinking a US supercarrier would inflict 5,000 casualties (Image: GETTY IMAGES)


world-war-3-China-USA-Expresse.Co-UK-04

China is fortifying its claims in the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea (Image: GETTY IMAGES)

Experts have warned that the increased military presence from both sides raises the risk of miscalculation and could spark a conflict between the two superpowers.

Lou told the military summit in Shenzhen that America is open to attack through its “five cornerstones”, including its money, talent, electoral system and fear of adversaries.

He declared China should “use its strength to attack the enemy’s shortcomings” by targeting “wherever the enemy is afraid of being hit”.

Lou claimed Beijing holds three “bargaining chips” which it could use to target President Trump and the United States, including what he described as America’s “second-rate” automotive industry and US soybean exports.


world-war-3-China-USA-Expresse.Co-UK-03

His remarks come as Mr Trump claimed “big progress” is being made in US-China relations.
In a December 29 tweet, the US President said a deal aimed at redressing trade imbalance between the rival nations is “moving along very well”.

Mr Trump said he had spoken to his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, in a “long and very good” telephone call, but Chinese state media downplayed the significance of the call.

Meanwhile, Beijing has revealed its military top priorities for 2019 include strengthening training and preparation for war.

An editorial published on New Year’s Day in the state-run military newspaper the PLA Daily said: “We should be well prepared for all directions of military struggle and comprehensively improve troops’ combat response in emergencies to ensure we can meet the challenge and win when there is a situation.”

 
 
 
 
U.S. and India, Wary of China, Agree to Strengthen Military Ties

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/world/asia/us-india-military-agreement.html


US-India-Wary-of-Chaina-TheNewYorkTimes-ManishSwarup-AssociatedPress-06.09.2018

From left, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, with India’s foreign and defense ministers, Sushma Swaraj and Nirmala Sitharaman, in New Delhi on Thursday.

By Maria Abi-Habib
Sept. 6, 2018


NEW DELHI — The United States and India signed an agreement Thursday to pave the way for New Delhi to buy advanced American weaponry and to share sensitive military technology, strengthening their military partnership as both powers warily eye the rise of China.

“Today’s fruitful discussion illustrated the value of continued cooperation between the world’s two largest democracies,” said Jim Mattis, the United States defense secretary, at a news conference on Thursday after the agreement was signed. “We will work together for a free and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”

The countries also promised to hold joint land, sea and air military exercises in India next year. In the past, they have held joint exercises outside the country.

But despite the friendly handshakes and flattering remarks exchanged as Mr. Mattis and Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, met with their counterparts in New Delhi on Wednesday and Thursday, the two countries remain deeply skeptical of each other.

The United States is worried about how willing India will be to openly counter China as the Chinese expand their influence in the waters between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It is also unhappy about India’s reluctance to cut trade relations with Iran.

India views the Trump administration as erratic, and it is troubled by the United States’ recent barriers to trade, which threaten to impose tariffs on Indian goods and force New Delhi to import more American products.

Still, the agreement won praise.

“This is a huge deal,” said Rudra Chaudhuri, a senior lecturer at King’s College, London. “In one sense, it makes clear that the wind in the U.S.-India sail is strong, whatever differences there might be.”

The Indian and American defense secretaries, he said, have pulled off a big accomplishment “at a time the Trump White House remains committed to undermining the United States’ global partnerships.”

India is critical to the United States’ new “Indo-Pacific” strategy — formerly known as “Asia-Pacific” — which aims to curb the growing influence of China’s navy in the region by elevating New Delhi as a cornerstone of future military cooperation.

Although India is worried about China’s growing influence in the region — the two militaries engaged in a tense standoff over a disputed border region last year — New Delhi prefers to avert confrontation with Beijing when it can. That reluctance may stymie Washington’s plans for India to be a linchpin of its efforts to counter China, American officials worry.

India’s military budget this year is $45 billion, while China’s is $175 billion. India has 18 submarines in service; China has 78.

New Delhi has been alarmed by the growing presence of Chinese submarines in its traditional sphere of influence, and as Beijing strikes seaport deals with countries encircling India. Western and Indian diplomats worry China may turn these seaports, currently used for commercial purposes, into calling docks for Beijing’s navy by leveraging the enormous debt of countries it has lent money to across the region.

The goal of the trip by the American delegation this week was to smooth over the ability of the United States and India to cooperate militarily. Under the pact signed by the two countries, the Communication Compatibility and Security Agreement, the United States will transfer high-tech communications platforms to India. Until now, the countries have communicated over open radio channels.

“The defense cooperation has emerged as the most significant dimension of our strategic partnership and as a key driver of our overall bilateral relationship,” India’s defense minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, said at the news conference Thursday, sitting with Mr. Mattis and Mike Pompeo.

American sanctions on Russia and Iran also loomed over the meetings, as both countries have major deals and economic ties with India.

Earlier this year, President Trump scrapped the Iran nuclear deal and reinstated sanctions on the country, which currently supplies roughly 20 percent of India’s oil needs. Indian businesses also have deep ties in Iran.

Mr. Trump has given allies a November deadline to stop trading with Iran or also face sanctions, but Indian officials have said they would ignore the threats and continue buying Iranian oil. Earlier this week, Mr. Pompeo acknowledged that Iran would feature in the negotiations in New Delhi, but said they would be a minor part of discussions.

India is also set to buy a Russian antiaircraft missile system, the S-400 Triumf, a $6 billion deal that violates sanctions that Congress imposed earlier this year on Russia.

American officials have indicated they may overlook the purchase, but they remain irked by New Delhi’s reliance on Russian defense equipment, which makes up the bulk of India’s military hardware.

Washington has tried to increase its military sales to New Delhi over the years. Sales have gone from nearly zero a decade ago to an estimated $18 billion next year.

Gardiner Harris in Washington contributed to this report.

Maria Abi-Habib is a staff correspondent covering South Asia. She can be found on Twitter here: @abihabib

 
KICKED BACK
China’s “debt trap” is even worse than we thought
By Tim FernholzJune 28, 2018

https://qz.com/1317234/chinas-debt-trap-in-sri-lanka-is-even-worse-than-we-thought/


Mahinda-Rajapaska-China-debt-Hambantota-belt-and-road-geopolitics-finance-port-submarine-qz.com-2007

 

Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaska meets with Chinese premier Wen Jiabao in 2007.

An egotistical president, an influx of foreign cash, and a massive pile of debt led to Sri Lanka handing over an entire port to China in December 2017, on a century-long lease.

That handover gave China a strategic foothold just 100 miles from its rival India, akin to how the Soviet Union’s foothold in Cuba raised US blood pressure during the Cold War. Chinese submarines have already appeared there.

But now new details have emerged, including the news that despite ceding the port, Sri Lanka is more indebted to Beijing than ever thanks to the high interest rates on its existing loans. This year, the country owes nearly $13 billion, out of a forecast revenue of less than $14 billion.

Such a vulnerability to global influence is one reason China spent millions in 2015 trying to re-elect the Sri Lankan president, Mahinda Rajapaksa, who signed off on many of those debts, lost his office, and is now plotting a return to power.

A New York Times investigation elaborates on the story of how the port at Hambantota came to be, despite the fact that there was little apparent need for a new working harbor on the small island nation. Instead, the site was chosen because it was the political base of Rajapaksa, who sought a symbolic project to celebrate his greatness.

Rajapaksa’s regime had grown close to China as Sri Lanka faced international isolation at the tail end of a brutal civil war between the government and Tamil insurgents. China continued to provide funds and support for Rajapaksa, and in turn he supported Chinese foreign-policy objectives in the region.

So when he sought to build a port, China was generous, with hundreds of millions of dollars in loans—as long as Chinese companies could build the port, and the comings and goings there could be shared with Chinese intelligence. As the project stretched on, growing increasingly over-budget with little apparent revenue, new loans, with ever-higher interest rates, were needed. The port opened early, in 2010, but there was still a large rock blocking ships from entering that needed to be destroyed—at a cost of $40 million.

Despite China’s spending on the 2015 election, Rajapaksa was pushed out over corruption concerns. But the new government had little choice but to accede to China’s demand to hand over the port in 2018 as the country’s debts worsened. In 2017, it borrowed $1.5 billion from the IMF, but this wasn’t enough—in May 2018, Sri Lanka took a new loan worth $1 billion from the China Development Bank.

Sri Lanka isn’t the only country now fretting about debt to China. The Center for Global Development, a nonprofit research firm, analyzed debt to China that will be incurred while participating in the planned Belt and Road infrastructure investment scheme. It concluded that eight nations could find themselves vulnerable to above-average debt: Djibouti, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, the Maldives, Mongolia, Montenegro, Pakistan, and Tajikistan.

Back in Sri Lanka, the government says that foreign militaries are still forbidden at the Hambantota port. But China’s history of broken promises when it comes to military installations abroad, combined with Sri Lanka’s still-rising debt load, means that any restriction could be temporary.

A new party led by Rajapaksa won local elections in 2018, and while he is prohibited from seeking the presidency again, one of his brothers is seen as a potential candidate for national elections in 2020.

 
China’s trillion-dollar plan to dominate global trade
It’s about more than just economics.

By Sam Ellis Apr 6, 2018, 2:45pm EDT
https://www.vox.com/2018/4/6/17206230/china-trade-belt-road-economy


THUMB_YT_Vox.com_by_google

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvXROXiIpvQ

China's trillion dollar plan to dominate global trade
33550001 vues

China has embarked on the most ambitious infrastructure project in modern world history. It’s called the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and it spans three continents and covers almost 60 percent of the world’s population. It’s how China plans to become the world’s next superpower.

The BRI essentially has two parts. The first, the economic belt, is made up of six corridors that direct trade to and from China. These corridors include roads, railways, bridges, power plants — anything that makes it easier for Europe, Asia, and Africa to trade goods with China. The second part, the maritime silk road, is a chain of seaports from the South China Sea to the Indian Ocean that direct maritime trade to and from China.

China is loaning trillions of dollars to countries willing to host these projects. They’re promoted as a win-win for everyone. Many of the countries involved need new infrastructure and access to new markets, while China needs new projects for its growing construction industry. But many of the countries involved in the BRI are authoritarian, corrupt, and in conflict — risky places for China to invest money in.

Watch the video above to see why China is willing to take that risk with its Belt and Road Initiative. You can find this video and all of Vox’s videos on YouTube. Subscribe for the latest.

 
Changing China policy: Are we in search of enemies?
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2015/06/22/changing-china-policy-are-we-in-search-of-enemies/

Jeffrey A. Bader
Monday, June 22, 2015

No. 1 (June 2015)
East Asia has avoided major military conflicts since the 1970s. After the United States fought three wars in the preceding four decades originating in East Asia, with a quarter of a million lost American lives, this is no small achievement. It is owing to the maturity and good sense of most of the states of the region, their emphasis on economic growth over settling scores, and the American alliances and security presence that have deterred military action and provided comfort to most peoples and states. But above all else, it is due to the reconciliation of the Asia-Pacific’s major powers, the United States and China, initiated by Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger and nurtured by every American administration and Chinese leadership since.

Judging by recent public commentary from a number of American foreign policy experts, this reconciliation is in danger of unraveling. Some argue that it should. In reaction principally to China’s aggressive land reclamation projects on disputed atolls and reefs in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea that seem to prefigure establishment of military outposts far from China’s coast, they argue that the policies pursued by eight presidents beginning with Nixon are outdated. They contend that we need to accept that strategic accommodation with a China seeking to dominate the western Pacific is impossible and we should accept, even embrace, a relationship built on rivalry, with cooperation sidelined.

In a world beset with grave challenges to order, established governments, and accepted international norms, with vast swathes of the greater Middle East ungoverned, ungovernable, and home to threatening insurgencies, with Russia destabilizing a neighboring sovereign state through military intervention and pressure, it is not in the U.S. interest to be complicit in turning the world’s most stable, orderly, economically dynamic region into yet one more area of conflict. If we follow the advice of those who seek to define our relationship with China as one of unchecked rivalry, that is what we invite.

U.S. relations with China have never been and never will be easy to manage. China is the world’s preeminent rising power. Its military has gone from bloated and backward to well-funded and technologically advanced in two decades. Its economy challenges ours as the world’s largest. Its political system is highly repressive and intolerant of dissent. It views U.S. alliances in the region as threatening to its security and therefore seeks to weaken them.

On the other hand, the United States and China, individually and collectively, are the foundations of the global economy and the main engines of global growth. China is our largest trading partner besides Canada, and has been the fastest growing market for U.S. exports of goods and services for over a decade. After years of undermining the international nuclear nonproliferation regime, China is now firmly committed to it and has worked with us to seek to halt the Iranian and North Korean nuclear weapons programs. As the world’s two largest emitters of greenhouse gases and consumers of energy, the United States and China have a powerful interest in addressing these two challenges together, as the Chinese began to demonstrate when President Xi Jinping reached agreement with President Obama to cap its future emissions by 2030 and to sharply increase use of renewable sources of energy. With China facing terrorism in its western Muslim majority areas and surpassing the United States as an importer of oil from the Persian Gulf, it has no more interest than we do in seeing Islamicist radicalism and insurgency gain a greater foothold anywhere.

China is thoroughly integrated into the global economy. Our Fortune 500 companies see China as a market critical to their growth. In this respect, China bears no resemblance to the former Soviet Union, whose economy operated behind an Iron Curtain with client states and little serious interaction with foreign companies or countries. China is now expanding its multilateral economic footprint through the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which groups 57 members despite misguided U.S. efforts to constrain its establishment.

So as a practical matter, it is hard to envisage how a relationship predicated on across-the-board rivalry will either be successful in a world where China is so embedded or serve U.S. interests in a world where we need to, and sometimes do, cooperate on critical issues.

So how are we to evaluate what is going on in the South China Sea, where besides its land reclamation projects China has made ambiguous but disquieting claims to maritime rights in 1.5 million square miles inconsistent with the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea; expelled Philippine vessels from their traditional fishing grounds and denied the jurisdiction of an international tribunal seeking to adjudicate Philippine and Chinese claims; explored for oil protected by an armada of PLA and Coast Guard vessels in waters claimed by Vietnam; and called its claims to every land feature in the South China Sea “indisputable”?

Chinese claims and conduct have been deeply concerning, and have merited and received a strong response by the other claimants to the islands (Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Brunei, and Taiwan). The United States response has been both diplomatic and military:

publicly calling out China’s objectionable behavior,

developing a diplomatic strategy that has seen the other claimant states under the umbrella of the Association of Southeast Nations make unprecedentedly clear public statements of solidarity, and
deepening our security partnerships with other claimants by lifting the arms embargo on Vietnam and reviving the previously moribund alliance with the Philippines.

Most recently, the U.S. Pacific Command conducted surveillance operations near Chinese artificial islands, with a CNN correspondent on board, to demonstrate that the U.S. military will insist on its right to sail on and fly above international waters.

There is more the United States can do, diplomatically and militarily, to demonstrate to China the costs of its actions, to deter conflict, and to uphold international law and norms in the South China Sea. We should do so in a way that provides the Chinese with an “off ramp” to deescalate, using Xi Jinping’s visit to the United States in September as an action-forcing event.

Even as we deal with this important issue, we need to keep in perspective what Chinese actions mean, and what they don’t mean. Chinese forces have not sought to expel claimants from those Spratly Islands that they occupy, in fact in much greater numbers (by a factor of 4:1) than China does. The common media meme, that the 60 percent of the world’s commerce that flows through the South China Sea is somehow threatened by China, is absurd. China is at least as dependent on others for the free flow of goods, and it has taken no action to hinder it. It also bears recalling that this vast region has no indigenous population; it is not the Ukraine, no less the Sudetenland, with no population pressured by military force to rejoin an irredentist claimant. Still, there will have to be significant changes in China’s attitude toward its claims and its fellow claimants, including demilitarization of the land features, if frictions are to decline to an acceptable level.

Do China’s unacceptable actions in the South China Sea portend how China will behave more broadly in the world if and when it acquires the military capacity to do so?

Beijing still has considerable constraints against making its current assertiveness in the South China Sea a model for future behavior elsewhere. China has no military alliances, unlike the United States with its large network of global allies. It has no overseas bases. It has little modern experience in combat, and deeply ingrained reluctance to intervene in foreign disputes. It is not seeking to spread its political system, but rather is in a defensive crouch against what it sees as external threats to its system. It holds as a fundamental principle of international relations respect for state sovereignty.

While China’s conduct in the South China Sea is a challenge to its neighbors and for us, we should be careful about making assumptions of likely aggressive Chinese behavior in other very different settings. For China, the South China Sea involves sovereignty claims. The Chinese call sovereignty a “core interest,” by which they mean they are prepared to use force if necessary to defend it.

Taiwan, the Senkaku islands disputed with Japan, and its border with India also concern Chinese sovereignty claims. In all cases, the Chinese have used military threats and deployments to convey warnings, though they more often have relied on political and economic pressure and inducements to signal resolve. It is a considerable stretch to project Chinese military belligerence as a standard feature of the international landscape on issues not involving sovereignty from its use of military threats, though troubling, on these most sensitive sovereignty-related issues.

The United States has not exactly been passive in the face of possible aggressive behavior by China. Our network of alliances in Asia has been markedly strengthened in recent years. The military aspects of the “rebalance” policy are leading to deployment of our most advanced aircraft and vessels in greater numbers to the Pacific theater. U.S. declaratory policy to defend Japanese claims in the Senkakus has served as a bookend in Northeast Asia to U.S. deeper involvement in South China Sea issues in Southeast Asia. These are appropriate and prudent measures for the defense of U.S. interests and those of our allies, not a quiet accommodation at all costs.

Our security, and that of our partners, will not be aided, however, by a strategy that suggests we have decided that China is, or inevitably will be, an adversary. Our allies and partners in Asia certainly welcome our presence, security and otherwise, in the face of a rising and more assertive China, but they do not welcome hostility toward China. They want to see us work out or at least manage our differences, and to do so in a way that promotes continued economic dynamism and lowers tensions in the region. That will require us sometimes to resist unwelcome Chinese behavior that threatens to destabilize the region. It does not require that we make dubious pessimistic assumptions about China’s future behavior and set up a hostile dynamic leading to a downward spiral.

China, not the United States, will make the critical decisions about its future. If despite our best efforts, it takes steps that harm the security of our allies and partners or undermine global norms and order, that will be its decision, not ours, and we will need to adjust our strategy accordingly. We should not, however, discard the approach taken by eight presidents since Nixon in favor of an assumption of inevitable hostility and a strategy of across-the-board rivalry that may be compelling in international relations theory but which no president has found persuasive. I hope and expect that the ninth president since Nixon, though faced with an evolving China, will not discard the playbook used by the American statesmen who built and nurtured the U.S.-China relationship and built a generation of peace in Asia.

The John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution is pleased to release its inaugural Brookings China Strategy Paper, featuring senior fellow Jeff Bader. From 2009 until 2011, Bader was special assistant to the president of the United States for national security affairs at the National Security Council. In that capacity, he was the principal advisor to President Obama on Asia. The official PDF version of this paper will can be found here.

 
China and Russia inch closer together
https://www.axios.com/china-russia-relationship-closer-putin-xi-trump-f1e3e0e3-37ed-44f5-b8a1-fc71ed1551bb.html


China-and-Russia-inch-closer-together-Dave-Lawler-photo-MikhailSvetlov-GettyImages-14.12.2018


"You should see my nuclear stockpile." Photo: Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images

While Washington prepares for new cold wars, America’s two major rivals are warming up to one another.

Driving the news: Today alone, the Trump administration laid out an Africa strategy that is tied almost entirely to blocking Chinese and Russian influence, and President Trump used the word “China” 20 times in a relatively brief Fox News interview. U.S. foreign policy is increasingly defined by confrontation and competition with China and with Russia. But what about the third leg of that “great power” triangle?

I sat down yesterday with Alexander Gabuev, a China expert at Carnegie Russia, who told me the two giants are moving closer together — in part as a response to an increasingly confrontational Washington.

* Gabuev says there are "three elements of geopolitical tinder that allow Russia and China to swipe right every time" — the need for security on their 2,000-mile border, the complementary natures of their economies and the similarities in their authoritarian approaches.

* Those elements provide the foundation for a relationship that is growing deeper and is characterized by the phrase, "not necessarily for each other, but never against each other."

The long-standing issues of tension — like competition for influence in Central Asia or China's copycat approach to Russian military technology — have largely been put aside, Gabuev says.

* On military tech, he says, the Kremlin has decided that "China will get there in 5 or 10 years on their own, so we either sell it to them now or lose out." Likewise, they’re resigning themselves to the reality of China being a dominant economic player in their backyard.

What it looks like ...
* In September, China took part for the first time in Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum (EEF) and its massive Vostok war games.

* Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin emphasized their cooperation and mutual respect at EEF, going so far as to don aprons and make pancakes. China’s ambassador to Russia, Li Hui, said, “At present, China-Russia relations are at their best in history.”

* Putin and Xi met again at the G20 on Nov. 30, though their conversation was overshadowed by Trump’s high-stakes dinner with Xi and last-minute cancellation of his Putin meeting.

What we're witnessing is not a true alliance, but a partnership defined by pragmatism. Russia may resent becoming the junior partner in its relationship with a rising power, for example, but it also appreciates the economic and diplomatic cover it gets from China as it faces Western rebukes and sanctions.

The bottom line: I asked Gabuev if there's an existential fear of a China-led world in Moscow, as there is in Washington. He said Russian officials tend to view the U.S.-led world order as "finished," but don't believe China will simply replace America, in part because Europe and Japan won't get in line behind Beijing.

* In the meantime, Moscow sees U.S.-China competition working to its advantage. If Russia can keep its seat at the table as a second-tier power with a big nuclear stockpile, it can ultimately live with a Chinese superpower.

 

Understanding this week's China whirlwind
https://www.axios.com/us-china-relations-trade-war-huawei-bb0afb63-8156-49fb-ac8d-4c783d67dd58.html



Chinese-Police-in-front-of-the-Canadian-Embassy-in-Beijing-ADaveLawler-GregBaker-AFP-GettyImages-14.12.2018


Chinese police in front of the Canadian embassy in Beijing. Photo: Greg Baker/AFP/Getty Images

Just as signs emerged that China was softening on trade this week, Beijing seemed to ramp up its retaliation over the arrest of a top Chinese tech executive in Canada.

Between the lines: This confusing week in U.S.-China relations has seen signs of a major climbdown from China, over trade, in parallel with a major escalation. "The Chinese really are trying to keep Huawei and trade separate," says Axios contributor Bill Bishop.

On the one hand ...
Last night we learned that China has detained a second Canadian citizen, apparently in retaliation for Canada's arrest of Meng Wanzhou, CFO of Chinese telecom giant Huawei.

Meng was released on bail on Tuesday, but still faces extradition to the U.S. over fraud charges tied to U.S. sanctions on Iran. Her arrest infuriated Beijing, which has targeted its ire primarily at Canada, rather than the U.S.

On the other hand ...
The Wall Street Journal reports that China is "preparing to replace" its "Made in China 2025" initiative to dominate key high-tech sectors "with a new program promising greater access for foreign companies."

That follows news that China has begun to buy U.S. soybeans againand is reversing tariff hikes for U.S. autos. Trump is preparing to declare victory, telling Fox News today, "They're going to open the whole country. They want to please President Trump."

Bishop says he's hearing that the Chinese are indeed planning to make big concessions, because they understand Robert Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative, won't "accept warmed-over promises."

"So as long as Trump keeps his resolve there may actually be a chance for some significant concessions on trade, moves that Xi can spin domestically as not due to U.S. pressure but as part of the deepening of reform."

 
AP Exclusive: Anger with China Drives Uighurs to Syria Fight

https://www.voanews.com/a/uighurs-leave-china-fight-syria/4175307.html
December 22, 2017 10:50 AM
Associated Press



AP-Exclusive-Anger-with-China-Drives-Uighurs-to-Syria-Fight-Voanawes-22.12.2017

FILE - Uighurs living in Turkey and Turkish supporters, chant slogans as they hold a Chinese flag before burning it during a protest near China's consulate in Istanbul, against what they call oppression by Chinese government to Muslim Uighurs in far-western Xinjiang region, July 5, 2015.

ISTANBUL —
It was mid-afternoon when the Chinese police officers barged into Ali's house set against cotton fields outside the ancient Silk Road trading post of Kashgar. The Uighur farmer and his cowering parents watched them rummage through the house until they found two books in his bedroom — a Quran and a handbook on dealing with interrogations.

Ali knew he was in trouble.
By nightfall the next day, Ali had been tied against a tree and beaten by interrogators trying to force him to say he took part in an ethnic riot that killed dozens in western China. They held burning cigarette tips to Ali's face, deprived him of sleep and offered him only salt water. When he asked for fresh water, they gave it to him — in buckets poured over his head.

That winter night in 2009, Ali recalled years later, would set him on a path that ended on northern Syria's smoldering plains, where he picked up a Kalashnikov rifle under the black flag of jihad and dreamed of launching attacks against the Chinese rulers of his homeland.

Since 2013, thousands of Uighurs, a Turkic-speaking Muslim minority from western China, have traveled to Syria to train with the Uighur militant group Turkistan Islamic Party and fight alongside al-Qaida, playing key roles in several battles. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's troops are now clashing with Uighur fighters as the six-year conflict nears its endgame.

But the end of Syria's war may be the beginning of China's worst fears.
"We didn't care how the fighting went or who Assad was," said Ali, who would only give his first name out of a fear of reprisals against his family back home. "We just wanted to learn how to use the weapons and then go back to China."

Uighur militants have killed hundreds, if not thousands, in attacks inside China in a decades-long insurgency that initially targeted police and other symbols of Chinese authority but in recent years also included civilians. Extremists with knives killed 33 people at a train station in 2014. Abroad, they bombed the Chinese embassy in Kyrgyzstan in September last year; in 2014, they killed 25 people in an attack on a Thai shrine popular with Chinese tourists.

China is just like the West, its officials say: the country is a victim of terror, and Uighur men are pulled by global jihadi ideology rather than driven by grievances at home. Muslims in the Uighur homeland of Xinjiang, as one Chinese official declared in August, "are the happiest in the world."
But rare and extensive Associated Press interviews with nine Uighurs who had left China to train and fight in Syria showed that Uighurs don't neatly fit the profile of foreign fighters answering the call of jihad.

There was a police trainer who journeyed thousands of miles with his wife and children to Syria, a war zone. A farmer who balked at fundamentalist Islam even though he charged into battle alongside al-Qaida. A shopkeeper who prayed five times a day and then at night huddled with others in a ruined Syrian neighborhood to study Zionist history.


China-Syria-Fight-Voanews-22.12.2017-02


A map showing "East Turkistan," the name Uighurs who oppose Chinese rule call their homeland, a region China refers to as Xinjiang is seen at a bookstore in Istanbul's Zeytinburnu neighborhood, Dec. 14, 2017.

And there was Ali, a short, soft-spoken 30-year-old with a primary school education who knew little of the world beyond his 35-acre farm when he left China, a home that had become unlivable.

Sitting cross-legged one recent evening in an empty apartment overlooking a kickboxing gym in Istanbul, he recalled the vow he made the night Chinese police beat him for participating in a riot he never joined.

"I'll get revenge," he said.
Self-fulfilling prophecy

Ali's parents eventually got him out of detention — but it cost them 10,000 yuan ($1,500) in bribes to local officials, no small amount for the family of farmers.
Despite his release, Ali was not free.

It was late 2009, and Xinjiang was in lockdown. Four months earlier, hundreds of Uighurs had rioted in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, and attacked the Han, China's dominant ethnic group. An estimated 200 people died in the unrest that night, the bloodiest ethnic violence the country had seen in decades and an event that would change Ali's life and that of 10 million Uighurs in Xinjiang.

The government, caught off-guard by the unrest, rolled out an expansive security crackdown and surveillance programs in the region that have accelerated in the last year. Thousands of Uighurs, including moderate Uighur intellectuals, are believed to have been arrested or detained, some of them without trial.

Ali was constantly stopped and questioned wherever he went. He couldn't check into a hotel, buy a train ticket or get a passport.

"I had nowhere to go," he said. "Except out."

As the repression mounted, what began as a trickle of Uighurs fleeing China grew into a mass exodus. In 2013, more than 10,000 left across southern China's porous borders, according to Uighur exiles. Nearly all the Uighurs who spoke to the AP after returning to Turkey from Syria recounted being persecuted by Chinese authorities as a motive for taking up arms.

"The Chinese government had been accusing Uighurs of militancy for a long time when there hasn't been much of a threat," said Sean R. Roberts, an expert on Uighur issues at George Washington University. "That changed after the 2009 crackdown. It's become a self-fulfilling prophecy."

Escape and road to Syria
Desperate to leave China, Ali paid more than 100,000 yuan ($15,000) to human smugglers and made his way overland through Laos, Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia, where he received a Turkish travel document.

In Turkey, Ali drifted in Istanbul, working construction and electrical jobs for $300 a month. Within two months, his brother said he had met people who could take them to Syria, where they could learn weapons training and return to China to "liberate" their friends and family.

"We'll avenge our relatives being tortured in Chinese jail," he said.


China-Syria-Fight-Voanews-22.12.2017-03


A man reads a book in a bookstore where flags which represents Turkey and "East Turkistan," the name Uighurs who oppose Chinese rule call their homeland, are hung in Istanbul's Zeytinburnu neighborhood, Dec. 14, 2017.

Ali agreed, thinking they would go for a few weeks. They ended up spending two-and-a-half years in Syria.

The story of how Ali ended up in a distant war zone echoed the experiences of other Uighurs the AP spoke to in Turkey, who said they joined religious militant groups at first because of grievances against Beijing or support for the idea of a Uighur nation. Most knew little about political Islam that fueled jihadis in other countries, and none said they met with recruiters inside China.

But that changed as soon as they left China's borders. As Uighur refugees traveled along an underground railroad in Southeast Asia, they said, they were greeted by a network of Uighur militants who offered food and shelter — and their extremist ideology. And when the refugees touched down in Turkey, they were again wooed by recruiters who openly roamed the streets of Istanbul in gritty immigrant neighborhoods like Zeytinburnu and Sefakoy, looking for fresh fighters to shuttle to Syria.

Uighur activists and Syrian and Chinese officials estimate that at least 5,000 Uighurs have gone to Syria to fight — though many have since left. Among those, several hundred have joined the Islamic State, according to former fighters and Syrian officials.

As Uighurs streamed out of China, militant leaders have seized upon China's treatment of Muslims as a recruiting tactic. The Islamic State, for instance, regularly publishes Uighur-language editions of its radio bulletins and magazines, while the Turkistan Islamic Party has been releasing videos on a near-weekly basis, said Rita Katz, director of the SITE Intelligence monitoring group.

"How can those who are imprisoned due to their faith be freed? How can they be saved from this humiliation?" a masked Uighur fighter says in a Turkestan Islamic Party video released last year. "Words from our mouths won't help, but jihad for Allah will."

A faraway war
From Istanbul, several of the former fighters described taking buses or being driven to the border region of Hatay, where they would cross on foot at night through lightly guarded hills. After a three-hour hike into Syria, cars waited in a forest clearing to whisk them to separate camps dotting the country's north. One fighter said he simply drove in, unobstructed, on the highway from the Turkish city of Gaziantep.

When the Uighurs arrived in Jisr al-Shughour, a strategic town on the edge of Assad's stronghold of Latakia region, men with families, like Ali, moved into a ruined neighborhood of single-story brick homes where 150 families stayed. Single men lived together in larger apartment buildings.

The men undertook three-month training sessions in the use of Soviet AKM rifles, shoulder-mounted rocket-propelled grenade launchers, physical conditioning and mapping.

At the beginning of the course, the trainers showed off their prized cache of captured American M-16s and German G3 rifles, but each fighter received a battered AKM and cheap Chinese ammunition. Boys as young as 12 and 13 — mostly orphans — were taken to a separate camp for religious classes and physical training.

Two fighters said they received boxes of food from IHH, a Turkish Islamic charity group, that included rice, flour, meat and even fish imported from Thailand. One of the fighters said the food supplies were labeled with the foreign fighting group they were being shipped to — for example, "Turkistanis (Uighurs) or Uzbeks."

IHH spokesman Mustafa Ozbek said the group distributes aid in refugee camps near the Syrian border to civilians, but not armed groups.

"All of our aid is conducted officially, documented and reported," Ozbek said.

The Uighurs in Syria have a reputation for administering their territory with a light touch, said Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi, a British researcher at the Middle East Forum who has extensively interviewed jihadis in Syria, including Uighur fighters. They don't enforce an Islamic court system or replace local councils — unlike their close allies, the al-Qaida-linked Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, Arabic for Levant Liberation Committee.


China-Syria-Fight-Voanews-22.12.2017-04

FILE - Uighurs living in Turkey and their supporters, some carrying coffins representing Uighurs who died in China's far-western Xinjiang region, chant slogans as they stage a protest in Istanbul against what they call China's oppression of Muslim Uighurs, July 4, 2015.

Instead, an older Uighur would convene young fighters in the evenings to discuss history and politics. They looked to an improbable model for building an independent homeland: Israel and the Zionist movement.

"We studied how the Jews built their country," Ali said. "Some of them fought, some of them provided money. We don't have a strong background of that."

Few Uighurs spoke Arabic and most didn't mingle with locals, but at one point some residents joked that Uighurs should rename the city Shughuristan, a play on "East Turkistan," the Uighur exiles' preferred name for their homeland. The Uighurs were unconvinced.

"This is not our homeland," Ali and his comrades told the Arabs. "We want our homeland, we don't need yours."

Fearless 'pawns'
Like Ali, Rozi Mehmet wanted to do something to help his people fight Chinese oppression. His grandfather, a wealthy Uighur farmer, had been executed in the tumult of China's Cultural Revolution in the 1960s.

Three years ago, Mehmet left the ancient oasis town of Hotan and hiked into Syria to join a class of 52 Turkistan Islamic Party trainees.

Within six months, he would be on the front lines with a rocket-propelled grenade launcher strapped to his skinny back, sprinting toward government positions near Jisr al-Shughour.

Jihadi clerics have exhorted Uighurs to take up holy war and reap the rewards of martyrdom. But if he would take a bullet, Mehmet thought as he rushed into battle, he wasn't dying for Islam — or the virgins that the preachers promised. His homeland was the only thing on his mind.

"I didn't feel fear," he told the AP. "If I felt fear, how could I be able to build my country?"

As fighting escalated in 2015 and 2016, hundreds of Uighurs died in its campaigns alongside al-Qaida's Nusra Front, according to two former fighters who fought in northern Syria.

Radical groups have aggressively recruited Uighurs. Al-Qaida's leader promised in a video that Islamic militants would repay the Uighurs by striking at "atheist Chinese occupiers" after the Syrian war. The Islamic State has echoed similar pledges and the group in March released a Uighur-language propaganda video vowing to one day shed Chinese blood if Uighurs would join the Syrian struggle.

As the chaotic opposition splintered and reorganized, groups vied for the Uighurs' support and lauded them for their suicide attacks that often kept the Syrian army off-balance, Mehmet boasted.

An older fighter, also from Hotan, chided the young man, saying he was more cynical about why the Arab jihadis lavished them with praise.

"They praise us, which means they want us to follow them and fight for them," said Rozi Tohti, 40, who fought near the city of Idlib. They "are trying to lure us to become their pawns."

Dissent in Syria; threat to China
But several Uighur fighters insisted that, in their minds, there was a distinct line between themselves and the Islamic militants they fought beside. Some Uighurs complained about being stuck in Syria instead of attacking China, as they had been promised.

"We fight for them and help them control the country, and then Uighurs are left with nothing," Mehmet said.

After joining the TIP in mid-2015, Uighur fighter Abdulrehim visited a graveyard for fallen militants and wondered why there were no Uighur national banners. At one point, he openly challenged a TIP senior leader, Ibrahim Mansour, about what they were doing in Syria, he recalled.

"We haven't fired a bullet against our enemy, China," he told a group of gathered Uighur fighters. "We always fight alongside international terrorists. What's going on here?"

Many Uighur militants have grown tired of the war and are looking to leave particularly as Assad's forces gain the upper hand, says Seyit Tumturk, a Uighur activist in Turkey who often speaks to fighters in Syria.

He said it was impossible for Uighurs militants to liberate Xinjiang, currently blanketed with paramilitary forces and riot police. But he said Chinese President Xi Jinping's ambitious project to develop railway lines, ports, and other infrastructure linking various regions to China makes Beijing vulnerable to militant attacks abroad.

The Islamic State took credit in June for kidnapping and killing two Chinese teachers in Pakistan's Baluchistan province, which is a cornerstone of Beijing's so-called Belt and Road infrastructure project. In Kyrgyzstan, state security says a suicide bombing of the Chinese embassy in Bishkek was ordered by Uighur terrorist groups active in Syria and financed by al-Qaida's Nusra Front.

Chinese officials and Western analysts alike say that the Uighurs' experience in the Syrian jihadi melting pot will likely exacerbate violence against "soft" targets outside China. China's foreign ministry called the Turkistan Islamic Party a security threat for the Middle East.

"We hope our brothers, including Syria and Turkey, will work with us, strengthen cooperation and cut off the terrorists' cross-border movements and safeguard regional stability," the ministry said in a faxed statement in response to questions from the AP.


China-Syria-Fight-Voanews-22.12.2017-05


A man enters a shop in the Uighur immigrant neighborhood of Zeytinburnu, Turkey, Dec. 14, 2017.

The ministry did not address questions about the causes of radicalization but said that China's government has invested heavily in Xinjiang's economic development, protected its minorities' rights and treated them just as every other ethnic group.

"Of course, when there are those who try to create tension in Xinjiang, the Chinese government's commitment to striking against violent terror and ethnic splittism is unquestioned," it said.

Return to Turkey and an uncertain future
By June of this year, Ali had tired of Syria and wanted to get out. For him, the war consisted of spending months at a time manning checkpoints and patrolling borders.

But like many other Uighurs who sought to return to Turkey, he struggled to find a way back. Ali walked for a week to get around a wall built by the Turkish government on the border. He's now back in Istanbul and selling milk.

Although some of the Uighur returnees said they would attack China if the opportunity arose, others balked at the idea.

Uighur community workers are concerned that many of those cast back into Turkish society would struggle to integrate and be easily pulled back into radical groups. Many of the men make $200 to $300 a month, barely enough to cover rent in Istanbul, and spoke poor Turkish. Many faced daily discrimination.

Activists also worry about TIP recruitment continuing unchecked in Turkey, where it appears to have a degree of official support.

This year, Turkish authorities detained TIP members including a former top commander, ostensibly for his own safety, said a diplomat in Beijing and a Uighur activist who was allowed by Turkish officials to speak with him. But Turkey refused to allow Chinese intelligence to interrogate the former commander, deeply frustrating Beijing, the diplomat said.

Uighur leaders say Turkish police also have released several well-known Uighur jihadi recruiters even after the community offered tips that led to their arrest.

"There are suspicions that these recruiters have links with some individuals or agencies within the government," said Omer Kanat, director of the Uyghur Human Rights Project in Washington. "They're turning a blind eye."

Rozi Tohti, the middle-aged fighter from Hotan, sat in a meadow facing the ruined walls of old Constantinople and ruminated on the choices facing his compatriots in Turkey: give their lives to a radical Islamic movement that they did not believe in or struggle to settle into a Turkish society where they did not fit in.

One thing was clear. Returning to their homeland was out of the question.

"Who wants to live in a war zone?" Tohti said. "We once had paradise in our country. But it was being erased by the Chinese, so instead we looked for paradise in Syria."

 
Warning sounded over China's 'debtbook diplomacy'

Academics identify 16 countries loaned billions that they can’t afford to repay

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/15/warning-sounded-over-chinas-debtbook-diplomacy

Photograph: MA Pushpa Kumara/EPA

China’s “debtbook diplomacy” uses strategic debts to gain political leverage with economically vulnerable countries across the Asia-Pacific region, the US state department has been warned in an independent report.

The academic report, from graduate students of the Harvard Kennedy school of policy analysis, was independently prepared for the state department to view and assessed the impact of China’s strategy on the influence of the US in the region.

The paper identifies 16 “targets” of China’s tactic of extending hundreds of billions of dollars in loans to countries that can’t afford to pay them, and then strategically leveraging the debt.

Sign up to receive the top stories in Australia every day at noon

It said while Chinese infrastructure investment in developing countries wasn’t “inherently” against US or global interests, it became problematic when China’s use of its leverage ran counter to US interests, or if the US had strategic interests in a country which had its domestic stability undermined by unsustainable debt.

The academics identified the most concerning countries, naming Pakistan and Sri Lanka as states where the process was “advanced”, with deepening debt and where the government had already ceded a key port or military base, as well places including Papua New Guinea and Thailand, where China had not yet used its amassed debt leverage.

Papua New Guinea, which “has historically been in Australia’s orbit”, was also accepting unaffordable Chinese loans. While this wasn’t a significant concern yet, the report said, the country offered a “strategic location” for China, as well as large resource deposits.

While there was a lack of “individual diplomatic clout” in Cambodia, Laos and the Philippines, Chinese debt could give China a “proxy veto” in Asean, the academics said.

They also warned that the 2023 expiration of the compact of free association between Micronesia, Palau and the Marshall Islands could “threaten the unfettered basing access and right of strategic denial the US has enjoyed since world war two, and help the Chinese navy extend its reach past the first island chain into the blue-water Pacific”, it said.

China’s methods were “remarkably consistent”, the report said, beginning with infrastructure investments under its $1tn belt and road initiative, and offering longer term loans with extended grace periods, which was appealing to countries with weaker economies and governance.

Construction projects, which the report said had a reputation for running over budget and yielding underwhelming returns, make debt repayments for the host nations more difficult.

“The final phase is debt collection,” it said. “When countries prove unable to pay back their debts, China has already and is likely to continue to offer debt-forgiveness in exchange for both political influence and strategic equities.”

As a case study, the report cited specific concerns about Sri Lanka granting China an 85% stake in a 99-year lease on a major port in Hambantota.

The deal, which the report described as “opaque and contentious”, came after a decade of deepening debt ties with China. In 2007 China offered financing for the $361m port at a time when other entities were concerned about human rights and commercial viability, and then loaned a further $1.9bn for upgrades and an airport.

By 2017, when the port deal was signed, Sri Lanka owed more than $8bn to Chinese-controlled firms. The port, which was yet to generate a profit, became a “debt trap”.

“Once Sri Lanka made the initial commitment, the sunk cost and need to generate profit to pay off the original loans drove it to take out additional loans, a cycle that repeated itself until it was finally cornered into giving up the port in a debt-for-equity swap,” it said.

“This has sparked fears that Hambantota could one day become a Chinese naval hub, and sent a worrying signal to other debt-strapped developing nations.”

China has invested in or financed infrastructure developments across the Asian and Pacific regions, including large-scale projects representing sizeable portions of host nations’ GDP. The loans often require that Chinese companies build the projects, and complaints that locals are overlooked for a fly-in Chinese workforce are frequent.

It has also sought to expand its military presence, prompting warnings for nearby countries including Australia. Australia’s major parties have also voiced concern about the country’s diminishing influence in the Pacific.

The report recommended that the US target and streamline its investments, strengthen alliances and manage debt burdens, including through bolstering India’s role as a regional leader.

Last year India warned against China’s expanding BRI and urged financial responsibility with projects that didn’t create “unsustainable debt burden for communities”.

Beijing said in response that the initiative “is not and will never be neocolonialism by stealth”.

“Nor will China use the success of the initiative to undermine the influence of others and jeopardise the regional stability upon which the nation’s astonishing successes have been built.”

 
 
 
 

Estimated one million children go hungry in Sri Lanka, warns NGO (On estime qu'un million d'enfants ont faim au Sri Lanka, met en garde une ONG)

මානව හිතවාදී ලෝක සංවිධාන වාර්තා අනුව ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ දරුවන් දස ලක්‍ෂයකට කුසගින්න හේතුවෙන් මන්දපෝෂණය වැලදී ඇත.

CLICK ON THE PICTURES

 
DANGER_CHINESE_POLITICS_AND_BUSINESS_IN_SRILANKA
 
This Page Under Construction Please Wait....